Skip to content

Karen McCoy

My feedback

6 results found

  1. 18 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  OMS Vision  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Karen McCoy supported this idea  · 
  2. 13 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  OMS Vision  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Karen McCoy supported this idea  · 
  3. 7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  OMS Vision  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Karen McCoy supported this idea  · 
  4. 11 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  OMS Vision  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Karen McCoy commented  · 

    I agree wholeheartedly with the idea that payments should auto apply to the location of the treatment. We post by line item and do not understand why it would not automatically apply this way. If we post a bulk check by changing the location for each patient, it screws up the deposit report because the check shows up in each location.

    Karen McCoy supported this idea  · 
  5. 32 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  OMS Vision  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Karen McCoy commented  · 

    Kind of off-topic but 21248 is not billed the same as D6010. It is for 1/2 of an arch regardless of # of implants.

  6. 46 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  OMS Vision  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Karen McCoy supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base